Cases 1 - 10 of 554
NOT USED
as 2:2024cv00656
Plaintiff:
ZHAO LIQIN
Defendant:
MARTIN JAY MCDANIEL and Walmart, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Zhao v. McDaniel et al
as 2:2024cv00658
Plaintiff:
Liqin Zhao
Defendant:
Martin Jay McDaniel and Walmart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
McDaniel v. Garrett et al
as 3:2024cv00074
Petitioner:
Nicholas McDaniel
Respondent:
Timothy Garrett and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Doe v. McDaniels et al
as 2:2023cv00995
Petitioner:
John Doe
Respondent:
E.K. McDaniels and The Attorney General of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Arcibal v. Koch et al
as 2:2023cv00630
Plaintiff:
Francisco Arcibal
Defendant:
Natasha Koch, D. McDaniel, Patricia Houlihan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fernandez-Morales v. Currier et al
as 3:2023cv00115
Plaintiff:
Yoandy Fernandez-Morales
Defendant:
Currier, Hutchings, Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Devencenzi v. Tucker et al
as 3:2022cv00353
Plaintiff:
Robert Devencenzi
Defendant:
Tucker, Lewis, Eldon K. McDaniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dahir v. McDaniels et al
as 3:2021cv00487
Plaintiff:
Shane Micheal Dahir
Defendant:
E.K. McDaniels, James Cox, Garrett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitted v. State of Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2021cv00114
Defendant:
Dr. Naugh, Head Phycitist, Medical Director and others
Plaintiff:
Rachel Marie Whitted
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDaniels v. Gittere et al
as 3:2021cv00005
Respondent:
NDOC Warden Gittere and Nevada Attorney General
Petitioner:
Harvey DeAndre McDaniels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
