Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Fuqua v. Morgan County Jail et al
as 5:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
Justin Fuqua
Defendant:
Morgan County Jail and Trent McDowell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jerido v. Henline et al
as 2:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Antonio Orlander Jerido
Defendant:
Mike Henline, Ranier Daramus, James Norman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDowell v. Toney et al
as 5:2019cv01774
Petitioner:
Darrayl Mackquay McDowell
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Alabama and Deborah Toney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Marshall v. Henline et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv00405
Defendant:
Mike Henline and Officer McDowell
Plaintiff:
John Lewis Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jerido v. Henline et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv00060
Defendant:
Officer Evans, James Norman, T. McDowell and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio Orlander Jerido
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Presley v. Scott et al
as 4:2013cv02067
Plaintiff:
George Walter Presley
Defendant:
LaTonya Scott, Carl Sanders, Kim Tobias Thomas and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Broadhead v. Shoebridge et al
as 4:2013cv01861
Plaintiff:
James Broadhead
Defendant:
John Shoebridge, Lavolefiso Jones, Steven Tish and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney and staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Presley v. Scott et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2013cv00612
Plaintiff:
George Walter Presley
Defendant:
Latonya Scott, Carl Sanders, Kim Tobias Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Shoebridge et al
as 2:2013cv00641
Plaintiff:
James M Broadhead
Defendant:
John Shoebridge, Joseph H Headley, Jonathan Ragan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Broadhead v. Shoebridge et al
as 4:2013cv00266
Plaintiff:
James Broadhead
Defendant:
John Shoebridge, Jonathan Ragan, Joseph Headley, II and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
