Cases 1 - 10 of 29
McDowell v. Reeves
as 3:2021cv00722
Plaintiff:
Christopher Maurice McDowell
Defendant:
Carlton W. Reeves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
McDowell v. Saul
as 4:2020cv00084
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Demetris Shavion McDowell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
McDowell et al v. Tireco, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00330
Defendant:
Does 1-10, Tireco, Inc. and Shandong Guofeng Rubber & Plastic Co., LTD
Plaintiff:
Linda McDowell and Arnold McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Catlin Specialty Insurance Company v. McDowell Property LLC et al
as 3:2020cv00069
Defendant:
McDowell Property LLC and Daniel Daxon Owens
Plaintiff:
Catlin Specialty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McDowell v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00491
Plaintiff:
Beverly McDowell
Defendant:
BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production Inc.
McDowell v. Errington
as 1:2019cv00282
Plaintiff:
Gabriel McDowell
Defendant:
Joe Errington
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McDowell v. Amite County, Mississippi et al
as 5:2019cv00004
Defendant:
John Does 1-10, Tim Wroten, Amite County, Mississippi and others
Plaintiff:
Ashley McDowell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDowell v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2018cv00168
Plaintiff:
Brandon McDowell
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Bufkin et al v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America et al
as 3:2018cv00318
Plaintiff:
Joanna M. Bufkin and Michael S. McDowell
Defendant:
The Prudential Insurance Company of America and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jefferson v. NFI Interactive Logistics, LLC et al
as 3:2018cv00112
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jefferson
Defendant:
Timothy McDowell , John Doe Persons A-M, John Doe Entities N-Z and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
