Cases 1 - 10 of 71
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00479
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
MCGOWAN v. CORE CASHLESS, LLC
as 2:2023cv00524
Plaintiff:
KELLEY MCGOWAN
Defendant:
CORE CASHLESS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
EDWARDS v. CAMPELLONE et al
as 2:2022cv00809
Plaintiff:
GERALD EDWARDS
Defendant:
DOMINIC CAMPELLONE, COLLEEN KELLY, TYNIKA MUSE and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1345 Mail Fraud Injunction
Redclift v. Schuylkill County et al
as 4:2022cv00027
Plaintiff:
Sean Redclift
Defendant:
Schuylkill County, Schuylkill County Prison Board, Eugene Berdanier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBINSON et al v. Red Cent East
as 2:2021mc00074
Respondent:
Red Cent East
Petitioner:
JESSICA ROBINSON, Stacey Jennings and Priscilla McGowan
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01236
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
MCGOWAN et al v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2021cv20084
Plaintiff:
ROXANNE MCGOWAN and MICHAEL MCGOWAN
Defendant:
MERCK & CO., INC., MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. and MCKESSON CORP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ACKER et al v. MCGOWAN et al
as 5:2021cv02335
Plaintiff:
THE ESTATE OF FREDERICK ACKER, II and ROBERT ACKER
Cross Defendant:
ABC CORP. 1 THROUGH 10, CHARLES MCGOWAN, ROBERT MIKA and others
Cross Claimant:
CAROL MIKA
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #1 THROUGH #10, NICOLAS TRUCKING CO. INC. and BIENVENIDO RODRIGUEZ OQUENDO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robertson v. McGowan et al
as 1:2021cv00222
Defendant:
Dan Kinsinger, Bruce Cutter and Chad A. McGowan
Plaintiff:
Kashif M. Robertson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haskins v. McGowan et al
as 1:2020cv01810
Defendant:
Daril Foose, Daniel Rothschild, Tyon Meik and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Haskins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
