Cases 1 - 10 of 307
Pearson Education, Inc. et al v. Dong et al
as 3:2022mc80186
Plaintiff:
Pearson Education, Inc., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Cengage Learning Inc. and others
Defendant:
Zhiming Dong agent of D/B/A LANPIN08 agent of D/B/A MING1015 and Xiaodong Zhang agent of D/B/A LANPIN08 agent of NICK ZHANG
Pearson Education, Inc. et al v. Bahcaci et al
as 1:2022mi00047
Plaintiff:
Pearson Education, Inc. and The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Defendant:
Mustafa Bahcaci doing business as Booxland doing business as Bargain Textbook Store doing business as Mustafa Bahaci, Yasin Oduk doing business as Booxland doing business as Bargain Textbook Store doing business as Mustafa Bahaci, Fatima Oduk doing business as Booxland doing business as Bargain Textbook Store doing business as Mustafa Bahaci and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1963 Registration of judgment from another district
PICA v. BARNES & NOBLE COLLEGE BOOKSELLERS, LLC et al
as 3:2020cv04856
Defendant:
BARNES AND NOBLE EDUCATION, CENGAGE LEARNING, INC., BARNES AND NOBLE COLLEGE BOOKSELLERS LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ERIC PICA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
Bondi v. Grant Thornton International
as 1:2004cv09771
Defendant:
Deloitte & Touche USA LLP, Grant Thornton International, Grant Thornton International Ltd and others
Not Classified By Court:
Citibank, N.A., Buconero LLC, The McGraw-Hill Companies, SRL and others
Trustee:
Gerald K. Smith
Counter Claimant:
Grant Thornton LLP
Plaintiff:
Dr. Enrico Bondi
Interested Party:
Parmalat Brasil S/A
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Dianthis S.p.A and codacons
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
New Jersey Carpenters Health F v. The Royal Bank of Scotland Gro
as 19-763
Defendant / Appellee:
Gregory S. Metz, NovaStar Mortgage Funding Trust, Series 2006-6, NovaStar Mortgage Funding Trust, Series 2006-3 and others
Defendant:
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. and Moodys Investors Service, Inc
Not Yet Classified:
Federal Housing Finance Agency, as Conservator of Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
Plaintiff / Appellee:
New Jersey Carpenters Health Fund, on Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly Situated
Appellant:
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
New Jersey Carpenters Health F v. The Royal Bank of Scotland Gro
as 19-795
Defendant / Appellee:
Gregory S. Metz, NovaStar Mortgage Funding Trust, Series 2006-6, NovaStar Mortgage Funding Trust, Series 2006-3 and others
Defendant:
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. and Moodys Investors Service, Inc
Plaintiff / Appellee:
New Jersey Carpenters Health Fund, on Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly Situated
Appellant:
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
In re: Grand Jury
as 04-3138
In Re:
In re: Grand Jury Subpoena, Judith Miller
Amicus Curiae:
Center for Individual Freedom, Dow Jones & Company, Inc., ABC, Inc. and others
In re: Grand Jury
as 04-3140
In Re:
In re: Grand Jury Subpoena, Time, Inc.
Amicus Curiae:
Center for Individual Freedom, Dow Jones & Company, Inc., ABC, Inc. and others
In re: Grand Jury
as 04-3139
In Re:
In re: Grand Jury Subpoena, Matthew Cooper
Amicus Curiae:
Center for Individual Freedom, Dow Jones & Company, Inc., ABC, Inc. and others
In re: Fannie Mae 2008 Securities Litigation
as 1:2008cv07831
Plaintiff:
Comprehensive Investment Services, Inc., David L. Frankfurt, John A. Genovese and others
Lead Plaintiff:
Boston Retirement Board, Massachusetts Pension Reserves Investment Management Board ("PRIM") and Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System ("TCRS")
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Susan Kraus, Linda P. Schweitzer, Stephen H. Schweitzer and others
Defendant:
Stephen B. Ashley, Banc of America Securities LLC, Robert T Blakely and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Dennis R. Beresford, Deutsche Banc Securities Inc., Louis J. Freeh and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Federal Housing Finance Agency
Petitioner:
International Fund Management S.A., Luxembourg, Richard H. Moore, Martin Mahler and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
