Cases 11 - 20 of 24
USA v. Lateefah Body
as 14-1718
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
LATEEFAH MCKENZIE BODY
Dean McKenzie v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
as 13-4114
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEAN MCKENZIE
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION & CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT
Ronald Sever v. Adele Bauer, et al
as 13-3368
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD D. SEVER
Defendant - Appellee:
ADELE BAUER, TIFFANY CINKO, CROWLEY, Correctional Officer at Somerset Co. Jail and others
Defendant:
BONNIE MILLER, Nurse, WILLIAM RUMP, C.O./Lt., CHAD SNYDER, C.O./Lt. and others
Paul McKenzie v. Barbara Nixon, et al
as 13-3174
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL J. MCKENZIE
Defendant - Appellee:
BARBARA NIXON, THOMAS W. GREGORY and ALAN CLARKSON
Antonio Pearson v. Secretary Department of Correc, et al
as 13-1412
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONIO PEARSON
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SUPERINTENDENT GERALD ROZUM, DEPT. SUPT. SYLVIA GIBSON and others
Antonio Pearson v. Bureau of Corrections Industry, et al
as 13-1065
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONIO PEARSON
Defendant - Appellee:
BUREAU OF CORRECTIONS INDUSTRY, VIEWSONIC CORP, VIEWSONIC CORPORATION'S CFO SUNG YI and others
Antonio Pearson v. Bureau of Corrections Industry, et al
as 12-4161
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONIO PEARSON
Defendant - Appellee:
BUREAU OF CORRECTIONS INDUSTRY, VIEWSONIC CORP, SUNG YI, CFO and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-2606
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Daniel Woods v. First Corr Med Inc, et al
as 11-1898
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL M. WOODS
Defendant - Appellee:
FIRST CORR MED INC, CORRECTIONAL MED SERVICES INC, LISA SUGER, L.P.N. and others
Hurst v. Benton Counselman, et al
as 11-1791
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERRY A. HURST
Defendant - Appellee:
BENTON COUNSELMAN, JEFFERY HORVATH, STEVEN GETEK and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
