Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00262
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Scott v. Michell et al
as 3:2023cv00231
Plaintiff:
James Edward Scott, III
Defendant:
Melissa Michell, Gaylene Fukagawa, Vanessa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Devore v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department et al
as 2:2022cv01045
Plaintiff:
Alexandria Devore
Defendant:
Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, Sheriff Joseph Lombardo and Kurt Mckenzie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mendy v. Morrison et al
as 2:2022cv00569
Plaintiff:
Edward Bissau Mendy
Defendant:
James McKenzie Morrison, Kevin Lightburn, Roy Jones, Jr and others
Downes-Covington et al v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department et al
as 2:2020cv01790
Plaintiff:
Tenisha Martin, Gabriela Molina, Lance Downes-Covington and others
Defendant:
Kurt Mckenzie, Joseph Lombardo, Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brady v. Estill et al
as 3:2020cv00174
Defendant:
Vasquez, Benjamin Estill, Ruiz and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Micheal Brady
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDougald v. McKenzie
as 3:2019cv00361
Plaintiff:
Tyrone McDougald
Defendant:
Jason McKenzie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brothers v. Nash et al
as 2:2018cv00280
Plaintiff:
Terrence Brothers
Defendant:
Ernest, McKenzie, Mendez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKenzie v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 2:2017cv02901
Plaintiff:
Deborah McKenzie
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
McKenzie v. Berryhill
as 2:2017cv02752
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Jim O. McKenzie, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
