Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Walker v. D.O.C. Security Operations et al
as 1:2022cv01815
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Reginald Walker
Defendant:
D.O.C. Security Operations, Secretary of DPSCS, Executive Director Inmate Grievance Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Weber et al
as 1:2021cv00353
Defendant:
Moore, Wuestneck, Thornton and others
Plaintiff:
Jabari J. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Boyer v. Iser et al
as 8:2020cv01260
Defendant:
Case Management Richard Roderick, B. Cornachia, Warden Frank Bishop and others
Plaintiff:
Michael R. Boyer
Interested Party:
Division of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Williams v. Bishop et al
as 8:2019cv01677
Plaintiff:
Kernell Williams
Defendant:
Warden Frank B. Bishop, Case Manager Jason McMahan, Acting Lieutenant David Barnhart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02361
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Roberts et al v. St. Amand et al
as 1:2018cv02061
Plaintiff:
Daniel Deburgo, Brandon Roberts and Patrick Nerette
Defendant:
John./Jane Doe, Carolyn Atkins, Chief Security Frank Bishop, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Footes v. Bishop et al
as 8:2017cv01192
Plaintiff:
Aaron Devon Footes
Defendant:
Frank B. Bishop, Jr., Mary S. Johnson and J. McMahan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hart v. Roderick et al
as 1:2015cv02054
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Lekai Hart
Defendant:
R. Roderick, J. McMahan, Prosper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jalloh v. Simmons et al
as 1:2014cv02024
Plaintiff:
Siaka Tejan Jalloh
Defendant:
Melissa Simmons, E. Orndoff, J. Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hatchett v. Shearin et al
as 8:2013cv03639
Plaintiff:
Timothy Earl Hatchett
Defendant:
Bobby P. Shearin, Pennington and J. McMahan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
