Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Powell v. McMullen et al
as 3:2021cv00015
Defendant:
Beverly McMullen and Winidred Anderson
Plaintiff:
Michael Powell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
McMullen v. Centurion of Mississippi et al
as 3:2019cv00172
Defendant:
Dr. Patrick Arnold, Centurion of Mississippi and Unknown Gibson
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Steven A. McMullen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McMullen v. Hall et al
as 3:2018cv00838
Defendant:
Frank Shaw and Pelicia Hall
Plaintiff:
Steven McMullen
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McMullen v. Walker et al
as 5:2017cv00152
Plaintiff:
Steve Brian McMullen, Jr.
Defendant:
Dianne Walker, Gabriel Walker, Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sons v. Benton County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2016cv00181
Plaintiff:
James Lee Sons
Defendant:
Benton County, Mississippi , A. A. Arnie McMullen , Joe Batts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00196
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sappington v. Stanton et al
as 3:2014cv00174
Plaintiff:
William Carl Sappington
Defendant:
Johnny Stanton, Arnie McMullen, Margaret Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP v. 1.12 Acres in George County, Mississippi et al
as 2:2013cv00271
Plaintiff:
Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP
Defendant:
1.12 Acres in George County, Mississippi, Jo Ann Donald, OLA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Hoye v. Outlaw et al
as 3:2013cv00200
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Hoye
Defendant:
Timothy Outlaw, B. McMullen and Anderjko White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flack v. Outlaw et al
as 3:2013cv00082
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Scott Flack
Defendant:
Outlaw, Porter, A. Bowens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
