Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Forte v. McNellis
as 23-7716
Plaintiff / Appellant: DANIEL FORTE
Defendant / Appellee: Detective BRIAN MCNELLIS, Shield #5286, Detective EDWARD GARRITY, Shield #7920, NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Regions Bank v Eden Pointe, LP et al.
as 3:2023cv00946
Petitioner: Regions Bank
Respondent: Eden Pointe, LP, Gateway Housing Foundation and Terry McNellis
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0009 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award
MCNELLY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as FLN/8:20-CV-43245
Plaintiff: MCNELLY
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01475
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02298
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
McNellis et al v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv05475
Plaintiff: Joseph E McNellis and Pamela A McNellis
Defendant: Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc , Northwest Trustee Service Inc and Wells Fargo Bank NA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Ogle et al v. BAC Home Loans Servicing LP et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv00540
Plaintiff: Charles R Ogle and Melanie A. Ogle
Defendant: BAC Home Loans Servicing LP , Bank of America Corporation , America's Wholesale Lender and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-3516
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Shipman v. Minka Technology et al
as 1:2010cv03962
Defendant: Jim McNellis and Minka Technology
Plaintiff: Dennis Shipman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
MCNELLY v. U.S. RUBBER COMPANY (UNIROYAL)
as PAE/2:09-CV-90139
Defendant: U.S. RUBBER COMPANY (UNIROYAL)
Plaintiff: MCNELLY

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?