Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Cromer #211902 v. Eagan et al
as 2:2022cv00066
Plaintiff:
Edward James Cromer #211902
Defendant:
Michael Eagan, MDOC Parole Board, Brian J. Shipman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Selmon v. Central MS Correctional Facility et al
as 3:2018cv00515
Plaintiff:
Timothy Maurice Selmon
Defendant:
Central MS Correctional Facility and MDOC Parole Board
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Magee et al
as 2:2018cv00044
Plaintiff:
Lester Ray Brown, Jr.
Defendant:
Billy Magee, "Unknown" Rudder, Pelicia E. Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Russell v. Central Michigan Correctional Facility et al
as 2:2016cv13874
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Allen Russell
Defendant:
Central Michigan Correctional Facility, 87c Crawford County District Court, 46th Circuit Court and others
Taylor v. Johnson et al
as 3:2015cv00684
Plaintiff:
Claude Taylor
Defendant:
Johnson, Fisher, MDOC Parole Board and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whetstone v. MDOC Parole Board et al
as 1:2015cv00139
Petitioner:
Nevin Kerr Whetstone
Respondent:
MDOC Parole Board and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Matthew Hisler v. Michigan Parole Board, et al
as 14-2573
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MATTHEW HISLER
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHIGAN PAROLE BOARD, MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CENTRAL TIME COMPUTATION UNIT and others
Lightfoot v. Scutt et al
as 2:2012cv11097
Plaintiff:
Philip Lightfoot
Defendant:
Scutt and MDOC Parole Board
Philip Lightfoot v. Debra Scutt, et al
as 12-1054
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PHILIP LIGHTFOOT
Defendant - Appellee:
DEBRA SCUTT, Warden and MDOC PAROLE BOARD
Philip Lightfoot v. MDOC Parole Board, et al
as 11-1596
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PHILIP LIGHTFOOT
Defendant - Appellee:
MDOC PAROLE BOARD, et al
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
