Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Urve MaggittiIn re: Urve Maggitti
as 24-1660
Petitioner:
In re: URVE MAGGITTI
Respondent:
BRET M. BINDER, DEBRA RYAN, DANIEL E. ROLAND and others
Urve Maggitti v. Bret Binder, et al
as 24-1169
Plaintiff:
URVE MAGGITTI
Defendant:
BRET M. BINDER, DEBRA RYAN, DANIEL E. ROLAND and others
Urve Maggitti v. William Mahon, et al
as 23-3275
Plaintiff:
URVE MAGGITTI
Defendant:
WILLIAM P. MAHON, JOHN HALL, DEBRA TODD and others
Urve Maggitti v. Bret Binder, et al
as 23-3276
Plaintiff:
URVE MAGGITTI
Defendant:
HONORABLE BRET M. BINDER, In his Official Capacity as Judge, BENJAMIN D. KOHLER, Esq., Esq., in his Official Capacity as Deputy Prothonotary, ANTHONY T. VERWEY, In his Official Capacity as Judge and others
Urve Maggitti v. Bret Binder, et al
as 23-3277
Plaintiff:
URVE MAGGITTI
Defendant:
BRET M. BINDER, DEBRA RYAN, DANIEL E. ROLAND and others
MAGGITTI v. MAHON et al
as 2:2023cv04359
Plaintiff:
URVE MAGGITTI
Defendant:
WILLIAM P. MAHON, JOHN HALL, DEBRA TODD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MAGGITTI v. HON. BRET M. BINDER et al
as 2:2023cv02273
Plaintiff:
URVE MAGGITTI
Defendant:
HON. BRET M. BINDER, HON. ANTHONY T. VERWEY, HON. WILLIAM P. MAHON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MAGGITTI v. BINDER et al
as 2:2023cv01184
Plaintiff:
URVE MAGGITTI
Defendant:
HON. BRET M. BINDER, BENJAMIN D. KOHLER, HON. ANTHONY T. VERWEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Julio et al v. Key Club Associates, Limited Partnership
as 8:2011cv00012
Plaintiff:
Donnie Julio , Melissa Blanco , Vilnor Calderon and others
Defendant:
Key Club Associates, Limited Partnership
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
B. et al v. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA
as 2:2007cv03794
Plaintiff:
ESTEBAN B. and MELISSA BLANCO
Defendant:
SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
