Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Mercer v. Osborn Correctional Institution
as 3:2024cv00559
Plaintiff:
Jamyl W. Mercer
Defendant:
Osborn Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mercer v. U.S. Xpress, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00042
Plaintiff:
Eugene Mercer
Defendant:
U.S. Xpress, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Mercer v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2017cv02171
Plaintiff:
Vera Mercer
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00329
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Capece v. Kamp et al
as 3:2015cv01729
Defendant:
Darrin Kamp and Mercer Transportation Co., Inc.
Plaintiff:
John Capece
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lamberty et al v. Connecticut State Police Union et al
as 2:2015cv00378
Plaintiff:
Marc Lamberty , Joseph Mercer , Carson Konow and others
Defendant:
Connecticut State Police Union, Kevin Lembo, Benjamin Barnes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lamberty et al v. Connecticut State Police Union et al
as 3:2015cv00378
Plaintiff:
Marc Lamberty , Joseph Mercer , Carson Konow and others
Defendant:
Connecticut State Police Union , Kevin Lembo , Benjamin Barnes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mercer v. Rodriguez et al
as 3:2015cv00110
Plaintiff:
Vera Mercer
Defendant:
Fidel Rodriguez and Capital Alliance Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mercer v. Colvin
as 3:2014cv01074
Plaintiff:
John Walter Mercer, Jr.
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin and Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
DeAngelis et al v. Old Saybrook Police Dept. et al
as 3:2012cv00065
Plaintiff:
Jeffery DeAngelis and Nicole Wyda
Defendant:
Old Saybrook Police Dept. , Michael Spera , Jeffery Deperry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
