Cases 1 - 10 of 481
Diego Morales-Ortega v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1910
Petitioner:
Diego Herlindo Morales-Ortega
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Maria Weidenburner v. Merrick B. Garland
as 24-1903
Petitioner:
Maria Isabel Weidenburner
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Juana Garcia Rodriguez, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1699
Petitioner:
JUANA GARCIA RODRIGUEZ, M. M.G., B. M.G. and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States
Saad Khalid v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 24-5091
Plaintiff:
Saad Bin Khalid
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States, U.S. Department of Justice, in his official capacity, only, Christopher A. Wray, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation, in his official capacity, only, Charles H. Kable, IV, in his official capacity as Director of the Terrorist Screening Center and others
Harold Jean-Baptiste v. DOJ, et al
as 24-5087
Plaintiff:
Harold Jean-Baptiste
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States, Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
Tarlochan Singh v. Merrick B. Garland
as 24-1602
Petitioner:
TARLOCHAN SINGH
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1318
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cristian Torres v. Merrick B. Garland
as 24-1558
Petitioner:
CRISTIAN NOEL TORRES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States
Merrick B. Garland v. Rony Soto Santos
as 24-1733
Petitioner:
Rony Alfredo Soto Santos
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Francisco Moran Martinez v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1520
Petitioner:
FRANCISCO SALVADOR MORAN MARTINEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
