Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Presidential Candidate Number P60005535 et al v. Biden et al
as 3:2024cv00671
Plaintiff:
Presidential Candidate Number P60005535, Ronald Satish Emrit and Presidential Committee/Political Action Committee/Separate Segregated Fund (SSF) Number C00569897 doing business as United Emrits of America
Defendant:
Joe Biden, Hunter Biden, United States Secret Service and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00591
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00188
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00363
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Harris v. Ganim et al
as 3:2024cv00078
Petitioner:
Gerard Vondrake Harris
Respondent:
Joe Ganim, Michael C. Jankovsky, Roderick Porter and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Nastri et al v. Garland et al
as 3:2024cv00222
Plaintiff:
David J. Nastri and We The Patriots USA, Inc
Defendant:
Merrick Garland and Louis DeJoy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01413
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00802
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Santo v. Bush et al
as 3:2023cv00371
Plaintiff:
Louis S. Santo, III
Defendant:
George W. Bush, Merrick Garland, Dick Cheney and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
