Cases
Russell Tinsley v. Merrill Main, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-2846
Defendant / Appellee: LASHONDA BURLEY, PSY.D, JO ASTRID GLADING, Office of the Public Defender, CHRISTOPHER BEAUMOUNT, PH.D and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: RUSSELL TINSLEY, and on behalf of residents at STU in similar situation problems, et
DURMER et al v. HICKS et al
as 2:2019cv19259
Plaintiff: JOHN M. BANDA, BRUCE L JENNINGS, JOEL E. DURMER and others
Defendant: CAROLE JOHNSON, MARCUS O. HICKS, GEORGE ROBINSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANDA v. MAIN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv11757
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and MERRILL MAIN, PH.D
Petitioner: JOHN BANDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Raymond Alves, et al v. Merrill Main, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-4171
Plaintiff - Appellee: RAYMOND ALVES, MICHAEL CULBRETH and DERRICK SESSOMS, individually and on behalf of all persons similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee: MERRILL MAIN, Ph.D., in his official capacity as Clinical Director of the Special Treatment Unit, COMMISSIONER NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, LYNN A. KOVICH, in her offiicial capacity as Assistant Commissioner and Deputy Director of the New Jersey Division of Mental Health and Addiction Services and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOSEPH ARUANNO
TINSLEY v. MAIN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv07319
Plaintiff: RUSSELL TINSLEY
Defendant: MERRILL MAIN, PH.D, SHERRY YATES, SHANTAY ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NORIEGA v. MAIN, Ph.d et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv02566
Petitioner: ANIBAL NORIEGA
Respondent: MERRILL MAIN, Ph.d and JOHN J. HOFFMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?