Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01445
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Metropolitan School District of Wayne Township v. JUUL Labs, Inc. f/k/a PAX Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv03531
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan School District of Wayne Township
Defendant:
JUUL Labs, Inc. f/k/a PAX Labs, Inc., James Monsees, Adam Bowen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02020
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00829
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
COLEY v. METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF WAYNE TOWNSHIP et al
as 1:2015cv00159
Defendant:
JEFFREY BUTTS, METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF WAYNE TOWNSHIP, WAYNE TOWNSHIP SCHOOL BOARD and others
Plaintiff:
BRITTANY COLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MATKOVIC v. METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF WAYNE TOWNSHIP et al
as 1:2013cv00780
Plaintiff:
MARK MATKOVIC
Defendant:
METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF WAYNE TOWNSHIP and SANDERS SCHOOL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00639
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01047
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00687
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
