Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00310
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Smith v. WWE Inc et al
as 3:2022cv01580
Plaintiff:
David Adrian Smith
Defendant:
WWE Inc, Carol Riddick, Frank Riddick and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00576
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
MGM Resorts International Operations, Inc. v. Tylt, Inc.
as 2:2020cv02250
Defendant:
Tylt, Inc.
Plaintiff:
MGM Resorts International Operations, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lechner v. LVMPD et al
as 2:2019cv00638
Plaintiff:
Gerald R Lechner
Defendant:
MGM Resorts International Operations, Inc., LVMPD, CCAC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00443
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2017cv02783
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794
MGM Resorts International Operations, Inc. v. Quantus Holdings, LLC
as 2:2013cv01370
Plaintiff:
MGM Resorts International Operations, Inc.
Defendant:
Quantus Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Rembrandt Gaming Technologies, LP v. Boyd Gaming Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv00775
Defendant:
Boyd Gaming Corporation, Caesars Entertainment Operating Company, Inc., MGM Resorts International Operations, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Rembrandt Gaming Technologies, LP
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
MGM Resorts International Operations, Inc. v. Avero, LLC
as 2:2012cv00472
Defendant:
Avero, LLC
Plaintiff:
MGM Resorts International Operations, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
