Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Robert Annabel, II v. Jackson County, MI Sheriff Department, et al
as 26-1814
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WAYNE ANNABEL, II
Defendant:
JACKSON COUNTY, MI SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, ADVANCED HEALTH CARE, SHERIFF GARY SCHUTTE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-1800
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Neo Network, Inc. v. City of Detroit, MI, et al
as 26-1792
Plaintiff:
NEO NETWORK, INC.
Defendant:
CITY OF DETROIT, MI, JOHN PRYMACK, ARTHUR THOMPSON and others
Demetrius Blackwell-Esters, et al v. City of Detroit, MI, et al
as 26-1799
Plaintiff:
DEMETRIUS BLACKWELL-ESTERS
Defendant:
CITY OF DETROIT, MI, KAYLA ROE, ALEJANDRO VELA and others
Peter Lyoya v. Christopher Schurr, et al
as 26-1784
Plaintiff:
PETER LYOYA, Personal Representative for the estate of Patrick Lyoya (deceased)
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER SCHURR and CITY OF GRAND RAPIDS, MI
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01304
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Det
Lamar OCI North, LLC v. Big Rapids, MI
as 26-1778
Plaintiff:
LAMAR OCI NORTH, LLC
Defendant:
BIG RAPIDS, MI
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026at01441
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Demetrius Blackwell-Esters, et al v. City of Detroit, MI, et al
as 26-1747
Plaintiff:
DEMETRIUS BLACKWELL-ESTERS and TYRESE JACKSON
Defendant:
CITY OF DETROIT, MI, KAYLA ROE, ALEJANDRO VELA and others
OV The Farm LLC, et al v. Township of Peninsula, MI
as 26-1740
Plaintiff:
OV THE FARM LLC, a Michigan limited liability company, BOWERS HARBOR VINEYARD & WINERY, INC, a Michigan corporation and WINERIES OF THE OLD MISSION PENINSULA ASSOCIATION, a Michigan nonprofit corporation
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF PENINSULA, MI, a Michigan municipal corporation
Intervenor:
PROTECT THE PENINSULA, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
