Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Sutton v. Portsmouth City Jail et al
as 3:2024cv00152
Plaintiff:
Torrey Lee Sutton
Defendant:
Portsmouth City Jail, Lt. Col. Clemons, Major Riddick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nexus Derechos Humanos Attorneys, Inc. v. City of Norfolk Sheriff Joe Baron et al
as 2:2018cv00486
Plaintiff:
Nexus Derechos Humanos Attorneys, Inc.
Defendant:
City of Norfolk Sheriff Joe Baron, City of Portsmouth Sheriff Michael A. Moore and City of Chesapeake Sheriff Jim O'Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv00152
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Moore v. USA
as 3:2016cv00227
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Michael L. Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Moore v. Rappahannock Regional Jail
as 1:2015cv01445
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Moore
Defendant:
Rappahannock Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Farooq
as 1:2014cv01331
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Moore
Defendant:
Shama Farooq
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Prince William County Jail medical Department et al
as 1:2014cv00451
Plaintiff:
Michael Jermaine Moore
Defendant:
Prince William County Jail medical Department, Monica Yassin and Peggy Charrock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Prince William County Jail
as 1:2012cv01432
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Moore
Defendant:
Prince William County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Prince William County Jail Medical Department
as 1:2012cv00760
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Moore
Defendant:
Prince William County Jail Medical Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00756
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Motion for Return of Property
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
