Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Box Alarm Leather, LLC v. Manuel
as 3:2023cv00129
Plaintiff:
Box Alarm Leather, LLC
Defendant:
Michael B. Manuel doing business as The Hideout doing business as Royce Shields
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00454
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Land et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv09474
Plaintiff:
Linda J. Land and Michael B. Land
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Foust et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv30792
Plaintiff:
Frances Foust and Michael B. Foust
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johns et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv18642
Plaintiff:
Denise Marie Johns and Michael B. Johns
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Meade et al v. McWhorter et al
as 3:2014cv18132
Plaintiff:
Jerry Meade and Elsa Meade
Defendant:
Michael B. McWhorter and Pike Electric, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rule et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv11848
Plaintiff:
Liza Rule and Michael B. Rule
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Labbe et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv10271
Plaintiff:
Mary Labbe and Michael B. Labbe
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnston et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv02063
Plaintiff:
Maureen A. Johnston and Michael B. Johnston
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc., Sofradim Production SAS, Tissue Science Laboratories Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
