Cases 11 - 20 of 3,438
Assem Abulkhair v. George Bush, et al
as 10-2812
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ASSEM A. ABULKHAIR
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States, MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General of the United States, MICHAEL CHERTOFF and others
Dwayne Burns v. Michael Mukasey, et al
as 10-15470
Defendant / Appellee:
WILL WILLIAMS, MICHAEL SULLIVAN, ROBERT S. MUELLER, III and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DWAYNE B. BURNS
Lor Vang v. Michael Mukasey
as 09-72219
Petitioner:
LOR VANG
Respondent:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General
Joliffe King v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 09-1583
Petitioner:
JOLIFFE LLOYD KING
Respondent:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General and ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
Ujjin v. Mukasey et al
as 4:2009cv00038
Plaintiff:
Worlawut Ujjin
Defendant:
Michael B. Mukasey, Michael Chertoff, Emilio Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Parker v. BNC Mortgage et al
as 2:2009cv00336
Plaintiff:
Paul J. Parker
Defendant:
BNC Mortgage, Option One Mortgage, Option One Mortgage and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Parker v. BNC Mortgage et al
as 2:2009cv00333
Plaintiff:
Paul J. Parker
Defendant:
BNC Mortgage, Option One Mortgage, Option One Mortgage and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Daniel Radillo Jimenez v. Michael B. Mukasey et al
as 2:2008cv07255
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Department of Justice of the United States and Michael B. Mukasey
Plaintiff:
Daniel Radillo Jimenez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Mary Alejo v. Angelo Mozilo et al
as 2:2009cv00680
Real Party In Interest Plaintiff:
Mary Alejo
Plaintiff:
Mary Alejo
Defendant:
Angelus Funding Corporation, Countrywide Bank, Countrywide Bank, FSB and others
A Wholly-owned Subsidiary Of Countrywide Bank, FSB:
Countrywide Financial Corporation and Reconstrust Company, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
