Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Michael Baker, Jr., et al v. Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Inc. USA, et al
as 23-10803
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL BAKER, JR., THURMAN BATTEN, JR., WAYNE BENTEL and others
Defendant / Appellee:
GLENMARK PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. USA, MARLENE GOLDENBERG, APOTEX CORP. and others
Bradley Sanders, et al v. Ajanta Pharma USA, Inc., et al
as 23-10640
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRADLEY SANDERS, MARSHA SHOW, SHIRLEY BROWE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
AJANTA PHARMA USA, INC., AMNEAL PHARMACEUTICALS OF NEW YORK, LLC, AUROBINDO PHARMA USA, INC. and others
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE and PAR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Baker Jr v. Ajanta Pharma USA Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv10735
Plaintiff:
Michael Baker Jr
Defendant:
Ajanta Pharma USA Inc., Apotex Corporation, Aurobindo Pharma USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Baker v. Sodexo, Management, Inc.
as 3:2018cv01856
Defendant:
Sodexo, Inc. and Sodexo Management, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michael Baker, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Arkel International, LLC v. Michael Baker, Jr., Inc.
as 3:2014cv00508
Plaintiff:
Arkel International, LLC
Defendant:
Michael Baker, Jr., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
August Arnold v. CMC Engineering, et al
as 13-2759
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, EX REL AUGUST W. ARNOLD, an individual
Defendant - Appellee:
CMC ENGINEERING, M. A. BEECH, MICHAEL BAKER, JR. and others
Vessel Statistics, Inc. v. Albert Garaudy & Associates Inc. et al
as 4:2009cv01685
Defendant:
Albert Garaudy & Associates Inc., Baker/Mo Services Inc. and Michael Baker Jr. Inc.
Plaintiff:
Vessel Statistics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00294
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
