Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Bradley et al v. State Farm Lloyds
as 4:2022cv02276
Plaintiff:
Michael Bradley and Cynthia Bradley
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Dallas Texans Soccer Club et al v. Major League Soccer Players Union et al
as 4:2016cv00464
Plaintiff:
Dallas Texans Soccer Club , Crossfire Foundation, Inc. and Sockers FC Chicago, LLC
Defendant:
Major League Soccer Players Union, Clint Dempsey, DeAndre Yedlin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mireles et al vs. City of Harlingen et al
as 1:2013cv00081
Plaintiff:
Denise Mireles and Jennifer Nino
Defendant:
City of Harlingen , City of Harlingen Police Department Dispatch , City of Harlingen Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bradley v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2008cv00040
Petitioner:
Thomas Michael Bradley
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bradley v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2008cv00042
Petitioner:
Thomas Michael Bradley
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bradley v. Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2008cv00030
Petitioner:
Thomas Michael Bradley
Defendant:
Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bradley v. Quarterman
as 3:2008cv00083
Petitioner:
Thomas Michael Bradley
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bradley v. Quarterman
as 3:2008cv00082
Petitioner:
Thomas Michael Bradley
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bradley v. Quarterman
as 3:2008cv00084
Petitioner:
Thomas Michael Bradley
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
