Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Michael Campbell v. Rick Hill
as 23-55586
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL CAMPBELL
Respondent / Appellee:
RICK HILL, Warden
Dana Michael Campbell v. Aquarius Ltd et al
as 2:2023cv01576
Plaintiff:
Dana Michael Campbell
Defendant:
Aquarius Ltd and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Carrie Capolupo v. CHP, et al
as 21-16504
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARRIE CAPOLUPO
Defendant / Appellee:
CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL, P. HURTON, California Highway Patrol Officer #12656, EDEN THOMPSON, California Highway Patrol Officer #16577 and others
Capolopu v. Department of California Highway Patrol et al
as 3:2020cv09383
Defendant:
Department of California Highway Patrol, Eden Thompson, Michael Campbell and others
Plaintiff:
Carrie Capolopu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv08658
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Abel et al v. PORCH.COM INC. et al
as 3:2020cv00694
Defendant:
Matthew Erlichman, GOSMITH INC., Darwin Widjaja and others
Plaintiff:
Mary Barker, Mark Anderson, Cyril Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Pearson et al v. Porch.com Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00697
Plaintiff:
Vaughn Foulger, Holly Garner, Nichole Lynott and others
Defendant:
Darwin Widjaja, Matthew Ehrlichman, Brenton Marrelli and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Michael Campbell v. Warden Rick Hill
as 2:2020cv01530
Petitioner:
Michael Campbell
Respondent:
Warden Rick Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bouzeanes et al v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2019cv00713
Plaintiff:
Richard Richards, Olivier Durand, Danny White and others
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Campbell v. Berryhill
as 2:2018cv00320
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Michael Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
