Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Daker v. Deal et al
as 1:2018cv05243
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections, Cobb County Superior Court, Christopher Michael Carr and others
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daker v. Carr et al
as 1:2018cv03297
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Law, Patricia Beth Attaway-Burton, Amy M. Radley and others
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carr v. Ford
as 1:2017cv01064
Petitioner:
Michael Carr
Respondent:
Benjamin Ford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER & SMITH INCORPORATED v. CARR et al
as 1:2015cv00193
Plaintiff:
MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER & SMITH INCORPORATED
Defendant:
MICHAEL CARR , JEFFREY HOGUE , JEFFREY RIZZO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carr v. Mutti et al
as 1:2015cv00183
Plaintiff:
Michael Carr
Defendant:
Stephanie Mutti, Fulton County Georgia and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plastic Research and Development Corporation Inc. v. Carr
as 2:2014cv00707
Plaintiff:
Plastic Research and Development Corporation Inc.
Defendant:
Michael Carr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carr v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2014cv00853
Plaintiff:
Michael Carr
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Carr et al v. Wright National Flood Insurance Company
as 3:2013cv01215
Plaintiff:
Michael Carr and Cheryl Carr
Defendant:
Wright National Flood Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4001
Griswold v. County of Hillsborough, Florida Government et al
as 8:2008cv02066
Plaintiff:
E. Frank Griswold, III
Defendant:
County of Hillsborough, Florida Government, Hillsborough County Public Transportation Commission, David Michael Carr and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Goldberg v. Carr
as 1:2008cv21080
Plaintiff:
Michael I. Goldberg and Michael I. Goldberg
Defendant:
Michael Carr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0754 Receiver of Property in Different Districts
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
