Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-6249
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - None:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-5008
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nick Kolev v. Rabbi Davidi, et al
as 08-56790
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NICK A. KOLEV, P.E. Ph.D.
Defendant:
RABBI NISSIM DAVIDI, Administrator Rabbinical Council of California (RCC), RABBI MENACHEM GENACK, Rabbinic Administr Union of Orthodox Jewish Congregations (OU), THOMAS N. LEDVINA, Associate GC Office of the General Counsel and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-1995
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Roxanne Hercules v. Department of Homeland Securit, et al
as 08-16535
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROXANNE HERCULES
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, Secretary of Department of Homeland Security, in his Official Capacity and CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION
Al-Maleki v. Mukasey, et al
as 07-4260
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ABBAS HANOUN AL-MALEKI
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, Secretary of Department of Homeland Security, ALFONSO AGUILAR, Chief of Office of Citizenship and others
Starykh v. Mukasey, et al
as 07-4258
Plaintiff - Appellee:
OLEG ALEXANDROVICH STARYKH
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, Secretary of Department of Homeland Security, ALFONSO AGUILAR, Chief of Office of Citizenship and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 07-1055
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Patel v. Chertoff
as 06-2146
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VIJAYKUMAR A. PATEL and BHAVANABEN B. PATEL
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
