Cases 1 - 10 of 54
Michael Williams, Jr. v. Edward Spagel, et al
as 24-1503
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BRUCE WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant:
EDWARD J. SPAGEL, JR., PETER DREGALLA, BALESK and others
Debtor:
TAYLOR, CITY OF ERIE POLICE DEPT.
MILLER v. NOWAKOWSKI
as 1:2023cv00267
Plaintiff:
JAMES A. MILLER
Defendant:
JOSEPH NOWAKOWSKI, LT. AND CO3 DUBE, CO2 SGT JERMEY SPARKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Warden
as 1:2023cv01534
Petitioner:
Michael Clark
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gregory Thomas v. Michael Clark, et al
as 23-1768
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GREGORY THOMAS
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL CLARK, Superintendent, PATRICIA THOMPSON, Major, D. VARNER, Grievance Officer and others
James George v. Jeri Smock, et al
as 23-1519
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES EARL GEORGE
Defendant / Appellee:
MS. JERI SMOCK, CHCA, Health Care Administrator, MICHAEL CLARK, Facility Manager, CORRECTCARE SOLUTIONS WELPATH CORP and others
MALLES v. CLARK, et al
as 1:2022cv00099
Plaintiff:
JAMES MALLES
Defendant:
MICHAEL CLARK and PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell Williams v. Michael Clark, et al
as 22-1068
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MITCHELL WILLIAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL CLARK and DANIEL STROUP
WAYNE v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv04209
Plaintiff:
JOHN WAYNE
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, MICHAEL CLARK, ESTOCK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS v. CLARK et al
as 1:2021cv00230
Plaintiff:
GREGORY THOMAS
Defendant:
MICHAEL CLARK, PATRICIA THOMPSON, D. VARNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
STAATS v. GOVERNOR OF DELAWARE:JOHN CARNEY et al
as 1:2021cv00169
Defendant:
GOVERNOR OF DELAWARE:JOHN CARNEY, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS SECRETARY: JOHN WETZEL, GOVERNOR OF PENNSYLVANIA: TOM WOLF and others
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE STAATS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
