Cases 1 - 10 of 135
Davis v. Unknown
as 1:2024cv00646
Plaintiff:
Michael Davis
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael Davis v. Lockheed Martin Corporation
as 24-10080
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DAVIS
Defendant:
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01723
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Heard v. Miles et al
as 7:2023cv01424
Plaintiff:
Decarla Raietta Heard
Defendant:
Darius Miles, Michael Davis and Brandon Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv29629
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DAVIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv26649
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DAVIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv22182
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DAVIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv22192
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DAVIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv18278
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DAVIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv05014
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DAVIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
