Cases 1 - 10 of 63
Davis v. O'Malley
as 24-1980
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DAVIS
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act
Joanne Moskovic, et al v. City of New Buffalo, MI
as 23-1165
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOANNE MOSKOVIC, ALEXANDER MOSKOVIC, GENE KHALIMSKY and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF NEW BUFFALO, MI, a municipal corporation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-14026
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
IN RE: IBM ARBITRATION AGREEMENT LITIGATION
as 22-1728
Plaintiff / Appellant:
William Chastka, Mark Guerinot, William Abt and others
Defendant / Appellee:
International Business Machines Corporation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv61070
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00231
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
USA v. Michael Davis
as 21-12590
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL DAVIS
Davis v. Furey
as 21-1828
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael Davis
Defendant / Appellee:
Miss Keri, Nursing Staff, individual capacity and Miss Inderia, Nursing Staff, individual capacity
Defendant:
Richard Furey, Regional Chief Operation Officer, individual capacity, Nigel S. Rodney, Advanced Practiced Registered Nurse, individual capacity, State of Connecticut Department of Correction and others
Davis v. International Business Machines Corp.
as 1:2021cv06322
Plaintiff:
Michael Davis
Defendant:
International Business Machines Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 dj
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
