Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Davis v. Fleming et al
as 3:2020cv00577
Plaintiff:
Michael Davis
Defendant:
Loos, Fleming and Jim Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Westchester County et al
as 1:2020cv00517
Defendant:
Alexis Gendell, Asst. Warden La Spoulding, Sgt. D. Lopez and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Furey et al
as 3:2019cv01867
Plaintiff:
Michael Davis
Defendant:
Richard Furey and Nigel S. Rodney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Ramos et al
as 1:2019cv06419
Plaintiff:
Michael Davis
Defendant:
Raul Ramos, City of New York and Christopher LaRosa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ridge v. Havas et al
as 1:2018cv09803
Defendant:
Esq. Joel Proyect, Edward C. Bruno, Esq., Emmanuel Leon-Martinez and others
Plaintiff:
Melbourne Ridge, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ridge v. Havas et al
as 1:2018cv08958
Defendant:
Howard Block, Esq., Joel Proyect, Edward C. Bruno, Esq. and others
Plaintiff:
Melbourne Ridge, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Maldonado et al
as 3:2017cv02145
Plaintiff:
Michael Davis
Defendant:
Edward Maldonado, Kimberly Weir, William Faneuff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Drayton v. Young et al
as 1:2017cv05440
Plaintiff:
Frank Samuel Drayton
Defendant:
William Young, Jr., Michael Davis, George Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Department of Corrections
as 9:2017cv00257
Plaintiff:
Michael Davis
Defendant:
Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Malloy
as 17-154
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael Davis
Defendant - Appellee:
Dannel P. Malloy, Governor, in his official and individual capacity, Scott Semple, Commissioner, in his official and individual capacity, Monica Ellison, Deputy Commissioner, in her official and individual capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
