Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Samuelson v. King et al
as 4:2023cv01126
Petitioner:
Michael Dean Samuelson
Respondent:
Warden King, Rene Hinojosa and Russ Authier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Samuelson v. Masterson et al
as 4:2023cv01061
Petitioner:
Michael Dean Samuelson
Respondent:
Scott Masterson, Russ Authier, Officer FNU Ramirez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Samuelson v. King et al
as 4:2023cv01034
Petitioner:
Michael D. Samuelson and Michael Dean Samuelson
Respondent:
FNU King, Rene Hinojosa, Alma Montana and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Samuelson v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 12-11269
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL DEAN SAMUELSON
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Michael Samuelson v. Rick Thaler, Director, et al
as 12-51047
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL DEAN SAMUELSON
Defendant - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, JONI WHITE, Director of Classifications, T.D.C.J., MRS. BUCKNER, Byrd Unit - T.D.C.J. Classifications and others
Samuelson v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2012cv00299
Petitioner:
Michael Dean Samuelson
Respondent:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Samuelson v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2011cv02117
Petitioner:
Michael Dean Samuelson
Respondent:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Samuelson v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2011cv00571
Petitioner:
Michael Dean Samuelson
Respondent:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Samuelson v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2011cv00015
Petitioner:
Michael Dean Samuelson
Respondent:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
