Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-55348
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02877
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Clifton Marshall, et al v. Northrop Grumman Corporation, et al
as 20-56096
Defendant: PRABU NATARAJAN, ERIC SCHOLTEN, CHRISTOPHER MCGEE and others
Appellee: ALAN CARLSON, ROBERT STOLTE and PETER DELUCA
Plaintiff / Appellant: THOMAS W. HALL, MANUEL A. GONZALEZ, PHILLIP B. BROOKS and others
Other: MICHAEL FRIEDLANDER and JOHN MURRAY
Plaintiff: MARIA E. MIDKIFF
Friedland v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd.
as 1:2019cv25235
Plaintiff: Michael Friedland
Defendant: Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Leveque v. Flavor Boutique 796 Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv07285
Plaintiff: Berny Leveque
Defendant: Flavor Boutique 796 Inc. and Michael Friedlander
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00790
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Tewolde et al v. Flavor Boutique 796 Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv02687
Plaintiff: Napolean Tewolde , Lorraine Dornick , Adama Saye Wilson and others
Defendant: Flavor Boutique 796 Inc., Flavor Boutique 522 Inc., 392 CPW LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203
Friedlander v. Colvin
as 1:2013cv02401
Plaintiff: Michael Friedlander
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Friedland et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
as 1:2011dp20239
Defendant: DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
Plaintiff: Audrey Friedland and Michael Friedland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Friedland et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
as 1:2011cv00791
Defendant: DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
Plaintiff: Audrey Friedland and Michael Friedland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?