Cases 21 - 30 of 209
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv01957
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MICHAEL JOHNSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ABELON et al v. 3M COMPANY
as 9:2023cv00404
Plaintiff:
JOHN ABELON, JOHN MARK ALLEN, FRANK BEAMON and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rayvon Boatman v. Wellpath Recovery Solutions, et al
as 23-12925
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAYVON BOATMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
WELLPATH RECOVERY SOLUTIONS, ELIZABETH PORFERT, MELINDA MASTERS and others
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2023cv00255
Plaintiff:
JASON MICHAEL JOHNSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johnson et al v. Morgan
as 1:2023cv03892
Plaintiff:
Erika Johnson and Michael Johnson
Defendant:
Lonzay Morgan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Johnson v. GS Khehra Express Inc et al
as 1:2023cv01106
Plaintiff:
Michael Johnson
Defendant:
GS Khehra Express Inc and Inderjit Singh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Michael Johnson v. M McFall
as 23-12624
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
M. C. MCFALL
Johnson v. United States of America
as 9:2023cv81124
Plaintiff:
Michael Johnson
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv16505
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JOHNSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, AEARO LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johnson v. West (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00328
Plaintiff:
Michael Johnson
Defendant:
Christopher West
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
