Cases 1 - 10 of 20
McLeod v. Jones et al
as 5:2023cv01554
Plaintiff:
Michael D McLeod
Defendant:
Michael Jones, Shannon Caldwell, Asst Warden Cheryl Price and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Yarusso et al
as 1:2023cv23474
Plaintiff:
Brent Michael Jones
Defendant:
A. Yarusso, H. Fitoria, L. Paige and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Pelzer et al
as 2:2023cv00406
Plaintiff:
Donderrious Williams
Defendant:
Jeremy Pelzer, Michael Jones, Steven Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Jones et al
as 5:2021cv00736
Plaintiff:
Ferman Williams
Defendant:
Jeremy Pelzer, Michael Jones, Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DIRDEN v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2021cv00083
Defendant:
FRANK BELL, SCOTT TATUMS, JEFFERY BURNS and others
Plaintiff:
JOHNNIE LEE DIRDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lee v. Jones et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv00692
Defendant:
Michael Jones, Jr. and The City of Andalusia
Plaintiff:
Michael Tyson Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Jones v. Secretary, Florida Department, et al
as 16-11385
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL JONES
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Davis v. Bush et al
as 2:2016cv00430
Petitioner:
Mark D. Davis
Respondent:
Jennifer Mims Bush, Luther Strange, Chris Connolly and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Townsend v. Jones et al
as 1:2016cv00377
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Townsend
Defendant:
Michael Jones and Jeb Fannin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2013cv00470
Petitioner:
Michael Jones
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
