Cases 1 - 10 of 11
US v. Brandon Jones
as 23-7238
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
BRANDON MICHAEL JONES
360 Virtual Drone Services LLC v. Andrew Ritter
as 23-1472
Plaintiff / Appellant:
360 VIRTUAL DRONE SERVICES LLC and MICHAEL JONES
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDREW L. RITTER, in his official capacity as Executive Director of the North Carolina Board of Examiners for Engineers and Surveyors, JOHN M. LOGSDON, in his official capacity as member of the North Carolina Board of Examiners for Engineers and Surveyors, JONATHAN S. CARE, in his official capacity as member of the North Carolina Board of Examiners for Engineers and Surveyors and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00215
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
US v. David Jones
as 21-6623
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID MICHAEL JONES
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
360 Virtual Drone Services LLC et al v. Ritter et al
as 5:2021cv00137
Defendant:
Carl M. Ellington, Jr., John M. Logsdon, Andrew G. Zoutwelle and others
Plaintiff:
360 Virtual Drone Services LLC and Michael Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Jones v. Lowe's Companies, Inc.
as 19-1975
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL JONES
Defendant / Appellee:
LOWE'S COMPANIES, INCORPORATED
Federal Trade Commission v. Pointbreak Media, LLC et al
as 1:2018mc00656
Defendant:
Justin Ramsey, Daniel Carver, Modern Internet Marketing LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0754
US v. Brandon Jone
as 13-4726
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
BRANDON MICHAEL JONES
US v. Brandon Jones
as 09-4786
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
BRANDON MICHAEL JONES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
