Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Jones #617568 v. MTU Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2024cv00272
Plaintiff:
Michael Jones #617568
Defendant:
MTU Correctional Facility and Unknown Alexander
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones #617568 v. Richard A. Handlon Correctional Facility
as 1:2024cv00248
Plaintiff:
Michael Jones #617568
Defendant:
MTU Correctional Facility and Unknown Amsley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones #617568 v. Richard A. Handlon Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2024cv00250
Plaintiff:
Michael Jones #617568
Defendant:
Richard A. Handlon Correctional Facility and Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones #617568 v. Ingham County Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2024cv00251
Plaintiff:
Michael Jones #617568
Defendant:
Ingham County Correctional Facility and Justin Hagerman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones #617568 v. People of the State of Michigan et al
as 1:2024cv00217
Plaintiff:
Michael Jones #617568
Defendant:
People of the State of Michigan, Ingham County Jail and Michigan Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones #617568 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
Michael Jones #617568
Defendant:
Unknown Part(y)(ies), Michigan Department of Corrections, Justin Hagerman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Chapman
as 2:2018cv14068
Petitioner:
Paul Michael Jones
Respondent:
Willis Chapman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. Smith et al
as 2:2017cv11304
Defendant:
Richard Smith and Horizon Trust Company
Plaintiff:
Michael Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00229
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
