Cases 21 - 30 of 78
Thomas A. Walsh v. Michael Klopotoski, et al
as 12-1643
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS WALSH
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL KLOPOTOSKI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY CHESTER COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Hayes v. Walsh et al
as 3:2011cv01739
Plaintiff:
Davon R Hayes
Defendant:
Jerome W Walsh, Lawrence Mahally, Norm Demming and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Derrick Mack v. Michael Klopotoski, et al
as 11-3019
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DERRICK MACK
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL KLOPOTOSKI, NORMAN DEMMING, MARTIN WALSH and others
Keeling v. Damiter, et al
as 11-3002
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL EVAN KEELING
Defendant - Appellee:
PETE DAMITER, Corr/Supt/Assistance SCI Frackville, C/O GUARD SMITHROVICH, MIRANDA and others
Juston Boyle v. Ransom, et al
as 11-2831
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUSTON BAYARD BOYLE
Defendant - Appellee:
RANSOM, SGT., R. J. BATH, C.O., J. MATELLO, C.O. and others
Torres v. Beard et al
as 1:2011cv00863
Plaintiff:
Israel Torres
Defendant:
Jeffrey Beard, Michael Klopotoski, Vincent Kopec and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Juantez Tennyson v. Michael Klopotoski, et al
as 11-1345
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUANTEZ TENNYSON
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL KLOPOTOSKI, ATTY GEN PA and DA ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Jose Ramos v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 11-1166
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSE ANTONIO RAMOS
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY BEARD, In their individual capacity, MICHAEL KLOPOTOSKI, In their individual capacity, VINCENT MOONEY and others
Jacobs v. District Attorney's Office et al
as 1:2010cv02622
Plaintiff:
Andre Jacobs
Defendant:
District Attorney's Office, Jeffery A. Beard, Office of Professional Responsibility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John McDowell v. Raymond Litz, et al
as 10-4635
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN MCDOWELL
Defendant - Appellee:
RAYMOND LITZ, Superintendent, JAMES T. WYNDER, JR., MICHAEL KLOPOTOSKI and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
