Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Meade v. Berryhill
as 1:2017cv01718
Plaintiff:
Michael Meade
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Michael Wheeler, et al v. Jersey City Police Department, et al
as 16-1904
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MICHAEL WHEELER and CARVISSA WHEELER
Defendant - Appellee:
JERSEY CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, POLICE OFFICER MICHAEL MEADE, POLICE OFFICER PORTER and others
Defendant - Appellant:
POLICE OFFICER MARK HENNESSY, SERGEANT TIMOTHY O'BRIEN and POLICE OFFICER G. VEGA, Badge No. 2803
Michael Wheeler, et al v. Jersey City Police Department, et al
as 16-1869
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MICHAEL WHEELER and CARVISSA WHEELER
Defendant - Appellee:
JERSEY CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, POLICE OFFICER MICHAEL MEADE, POLICE OFFICER MARK HENNESSY and others
Defendant - Appellant:
POLICE OFFICER N. MONTANEZ
DUBOIS v. HOLDER et al
as 2:2013cv05001
Plaintiff:
PASCAL JACQUES DUBOIS
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., JANET NAPOLITANO, JOHN T. MORTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DUBOIS v. HOLDER et al
as 2:2013cv04263
Plaintiff:
PASCAL JACQUES DUBOIS
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., JANET NAPOLITANO, JOHN T. MORTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MORGAN v. GAY et al
as 3:2013cv02470
Plaintiff:
SARAH MORGAN
Defendant:
DENNIS W. GAY , GINA GAY , BASIC RESEARCH, L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
WHEELER et al v. JERSEY CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2012cv07528
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WHEELER and CARVISSA WHEELER
Defendant:
JERSEY CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT , MICHAEL MEADE , MARK HENNESSY and others
Cross_claimant:
N. MONTANEZ
Cross_defendant:
N. MONTANEZ , B. CULLINAN , MARK HENNESSY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Meade v. Quintess LLC et al
as 1:2009cv00210
Plaintiff:
Michael Meade
Defendant:
Quintess LLC, Hemisphere Club Management LLC and Club Holdings LLC
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
