Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Meade v. Jackson
as 1:2015cv00362
Petitioner:
Michael Meade
Respondent:
Theodore Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Meade v. Jackson et al
as 1:2015cv00301
Plaintiff:
Michael Meade
Defendant:
Theodore Jackson, Sutton, Norris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Veiga v. Hassell et al
as 4:2014cv00886
Petitioner:
Tom Cris Vicente Veiga
Respondent:
Scott Hassell , Michael Meade and Eric Holder, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mire v. Hassell et al
as 4:2014cv00887
Petitioner:
Abdiaziz Ali Mire
Respondent:
Scott Hassell , Michael Meade and Eric Holder, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
DUBOIS v. HOLDER et al
as 2:2013cv05001
Plaintiff:
PASCAL JACQUES DUBOIS
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., JANET NAPOLITANO, JOHN T. MORTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DUBOIS v. HOLDER et al
as 2:2013cv04263
Plaintiff:
PASCAL JACQUES DUBOIS
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., JANET NAPOLITANO, JOHN T. MORTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mead v. Prince et al
as 2:2012cv01962
Plaintiff:
Michael Mead
Defendant:
Howard Prince
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
David Litmon, Jr. v. Santa Clara County Board of Su, et al
as 11-15996
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID LITMON, Jr.
Defendant:
SANTA CLARA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS and JAMES BABCOCK
Defendant - Appellee:
EDWARD FLORES, Chief of the Santa Clara County Department of Corrections, DOUGLAS TAYLOR, Lieutenant, MITCHELL CONNER, Classification Sergeant and others
Joseph v. Holder et al
as 3:2011cv00317
Petitioner:
Mario Joseph
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr. , M.J. Moore , Kim Boulia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Joseph v. Holder et al
as 3:2011cv00184
Petitioner:
Mario Joseph
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., M. J. Moore, Kim Boulia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
