Cases 1 - 10 of 169
Papadopoulos v. The US Government et al
as 1:2015cv02836
Defendant:
Judge Katherine Polk Failla, Alfonso Fanjul, Jose Fanjul and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Papadopoulos
FBI, SDNY,EDNY,US Trustees, US Attorney For The SDNY:
The US Government
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv05214
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Witkowich v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2005cv07756
Plaintiff:
Michael F. Witkowich
Defendant:
The United States Marshals Service , Benigno Reyna and Michael Mukasey
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Zormati v. Napolitano et al
as 1:2010cv02161
Plaintiff:
Bedis Zormati
Defendant:
Janet Napolitano, Michael Chertoff, Eric Holder and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv08895
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Belloc v. Mukasey et al
as 1:2009cv06628
Petitioner:
Jose Luis Belloc
Respondent:
Michael Mukasey and USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Zaleski v. Burns et al
as 1:2009cv04105
Plaintiff:
Alan Zaleski
Defendant:
Ellen Bree Burns, Nora Dannehy, Lev Dassin and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Bernard v. Mukasey et al
as 1:2009cv03504
Petitioner:
Placide Louis Bernard
Defendant:
Michael Mukasey, Michael Chertoff, Christopher Shanahan and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Hakeem v. Mukasey et al
as 6:2009cv06072
Petitioner:
Oumar Hakeem
Respondent:
Michael Mukasey, Micheal Chertoff, Charles Mule and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Camara v. Heron et al
as 6:2009cv06089
Petitioner:
Mamadou Camara
Respondent:
Martin Heron, Michael Philips and Michael Mukasey
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
