Cases 1 - 10 of 748
In re: Erick Pringle, et al
as 22-1993
Plaintiff / Appellant:
In re: ERICK PRINGLE
Defendant / Appellee:
ELON MUSK, AMAZON INC, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY and others
Defendant:
BELLEVUE HOSPITAL NEW YORK, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, ANDREW CUOMO and others
GARDNER v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2020cv04865
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, JOHN MCNESBY, RAYMOND HARLEY and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY GARDNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBINSON v. THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2020cv04529
Defendant:
OFFICER DAVE HENRY, MAYOR MICHAEL NUTTER, THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Plaintiff:
CARL ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christmas v. Toward et al
as 8:2018cv00932
Defendant:
Ronald Toward, Kevin Cox, Wayne Durden and others
Plaintiff:
Rickey Lee Christmas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHITE v. KENNEY et al
as 2:2017cv05201
Plaintiff:
LAMAR WHITE
Defendant:
JIM KENNEY, MICHAEL NUTTER, MICHAEL RESNICK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LITTLE v. RAMSEY et al
as 2:2017cv04483
Plaintiff:
RYAN G. LITTLE
Defendant:
CHARLES RAMSEY, JOHN DOE, JIM KENNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2017cv00563
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WILLIAMS
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA, JOHN DELANEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RIVERA v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2017cv00252
Plaintiff:
JOSE S. RIVERA
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA and JOHN DELANEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2016cv02785
Plaintiff:
DONALD THOMAS
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA and JOHN DELANEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDREWS v. KENNEY et al
as 2:2016cv01872
Plaintiff:
HAKIEM ANDREWS
Defendant:
JIM KENNEY, MICHAEL NUTTER, MICHAEL RESNICK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
