Cases 1 - 10 of 61
Osborne v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2026cv00050
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Michael Osborne
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Osborn v. Every Officer at Holman Prison, et al
as 1:2025cv00505
Plaintiff:
Jason Michael Osborn
Defendant:
Every Officer at Holman Prison and Staff at Holman Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Michael Thomas
as 24-2052
Defendant:
MICHAEL OSBORN THOMAS
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Perez v. Osborn et al
as 9:2024cv00491
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Perez
Defendant:
Michael Osborn, Lee Harrigan, Matthew Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Osborn v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 2:2023cv00290
Petitioner:
Jason Michael Osborn
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
OSBORNE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv18307
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL OSBORNE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
OSBORNE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv09220
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL OSBORNE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
OSBORNE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv09219
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL OSBORNE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Osborne v. Collinsville Police Department et al
as 3:2021cv00804
Plaintiff:
Shane Michael Osborne
Defendant:
Collinsville Police Department, Officer Severino and Chief Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. GEO Group Inc et al
as 3:2021cv00448
Defendant:
Pearson, E Lowe, Croft and others
Plaintiff:
Leonard Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
