Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Kimball v. Village of South Russell, Ohio et al.
as 1:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
Eric J. Kimball
Defendant:
Village of South Russell, Ohio and Michael Rizzo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rizzo v. New York City Department of Sanitation et al
as 1:2023cv07190
Plaintiff:
Michael Rizzo
Defendant:
New York City Department of Sanitation and CITY OF NEW YORK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ed Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
RIZZO v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv04547
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL RIZZO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rizzo v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2021cv04415
Plaintiff:
Michael Rizzo
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rizzo v. Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.
as 1:2020cv25062
Defendant:
Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd., a Liberian Corporation and Royal Caribbean Cruises LTD.
Plaintiff:
Michael Rizzo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RIZZO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv91309
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL RIZZO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BRAYMAN v. PORTER et al
as 1:2020cv00170
Defendant:
TRAVIS ANDREWS, CAPTAIN GARY CRAFTS, MAJOR RAYMOND PORTER and others
Plaintiff:
WADE DREW BRAYMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RIZZO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv22403
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL RIZZO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Porrini v. McRizz LLC et al
as 1:2019cv03979
Defendant:
Michael Rizzo, McRizz LLC and Meghan McNulty Rizzo
Plaintiff:
Vera Porrini
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Porrini v. McRizz, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv03979
Defendant:
Michael Rizzo, McRizz LLC, Meghan McNulty Rizzo and others
Plaintiff:
Vera Porrini
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
