Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Rice v. Kennedy et al
as 1:2023cv11940
Plaintiff:
Jordan M. Rice
Defendant:
Steven Kennedy, Michael Amaral, Amanda Rautenberg and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Nolau v. WSP USA Inc.
as 1:2022cv04276
Plaintiff:
Michael Nolau, Michael Rojas and David Jeannotte
Defendant:
WSP USA Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
ROJAS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv03218
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ROJAS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ROJAS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv20814
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ROJAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jairo Cervantes Ramirez, et al v. Does, et al
as 21-55219
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER LINGENHOL, CITY OF SAN DIEGO, ANDREW DUARTE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRANDON STEINBERG, JAIRO CERVANTES, NANCY SANCHEZ and others
Jairo Cervantes Ramirez, et al v. Shelly Zimmerman, et al
as 20-56117
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER LINGENHOL, CITY OF SAN DIEGO, ANDREW DUARTE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRANDON STEINBERG, JAIRO CERVANTES, NANCY SANCHEZ and others
Defendant:
DOES
Brill et al v. Postle et al
as 2:2019cv02027
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Sluzinski, Thomas Morris III, Adam Duong and others
Defendant:
King's Casino, LLC, Justin F Kuraitis, Michael L Postle and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
USA v. Michael Rojas, et al
as 18-11775
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL ROJAS and BARBARA ROJAS
FinishMaster, Inc. v. Darvish Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv04874
Defendant:
Alireza Behboody, Shervin Darvish, Darvish Group, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
FinishMaster, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2016cv01749
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.