Cases 1 - 10 of 61
Smith v. Thomson United States Penitentiary(F.B.O.P.) et al
as 3:2023cv50402
Plaintiff:
Matthew Michael Smith
Defendant:
Thomson United States Penitentiary(F.B.O.P.), Warden Gonzalis, G.E.O. Group and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv03242
Plaintiff:
Michael Smith
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Tiona Farrington, . Crews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Gonzalis et al
as 3:2023cv50226
Plaintiff:
Matthew Michael Smith
Defendant:
Gonzalis, Hess, GEO Group and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Myers et al
as 3:2022cv02175
Plaintiff:
Jared Michael Smith
Defendant:
Percy Myers, Christine Brown, David Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Monti et al
as 3:2022cv00435
Plaintiff:
Michael Smith
Defendant:
Warden Monti, L. Walker, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Stevens et al
as 3:2021cv00531
Defendant:
Misty Forwe, Bradley Shields, Taylor Douglas and others
Plaintiff:
Jared Michael Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Birch et al
as 3:2021cv00534
Defendant:
S. Stevens, Caldwell, Kimberly Birch and others
Plaintiff:
Jared Michael Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Stevens et al
as 3:2021cv00533
Defendant:
Connie Houston, Kimberly Birch, S. Stevens and others
Plaintiff:
Jared Michael Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HALL v. WATSON et al
as 2:2021cv00093
Defendant:
THOMAS WATSON, Michael Smith and THOMAS J. WATSON
Plaintiff:
CHARLES MICHAEL HALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. Kuforiji et al
as 3:2021cv00097
Defendant:
Misty Forwe, Penny George, S. Stevens and others
Plaintiff:
Jared Michael Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
