Cases 21 - 30 of 288
Smith v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv03242
Plaintiff:
Michael Smith
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Tiona Farrington, . Crews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Poff v. Smith et al
as 4:2023cv00621
Plaintiff:
Julia Ann Poff, Holli Telford Lundahl and Cheryl Steward
Defendant:
Warden Michael Smith and Collette Peters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lundahl v. Smith et al
as 4:2023cv00632
Plaintiff:
Holli Telford Lundahl
Defendant:
Warden Michael Smith and Collette Peters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Gonzalis et al
as 3:2023cv50226
Plaintiff:
Matthew Michael Smith
Defendant:
Gonzalis, Hess, GEO Group and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steward v. Smith et al
as 4:2023cv00633
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Steward
Defendant:
Warden Michael Smith and Collette Peters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norman v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 23-10478
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Alexis C. Norman
Defendant / Appellee:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Director Michael Carvaial, Michael Smith, Medical Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons and United States of America
Kelley v. Smith
as 4:2023cv00434
Petitioner:
Margaret Kelley
Respondent:
Warden Michael Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Lang v. Smith
as 4:2023cv00252
Petitioner:
Barbara Lang
Respondent:
Michael Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Blake et al v. Warden Smith
as 4:2023cv00238
Petitioner:
Faith Blake and Barbara Lang
Respondent:
Warden Smith, United States of America and Michael Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Barker v. Smith
as 4:2023cv00012
Petitioner:
Christeena Janell Barker
Respondent:
Warden Michael Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
