Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Judka v. Emmel et al
as 1:2024cv00531
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Judka
Defendant:
Dennis Emmel, John Derek Macomber, Maxine Moul and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Franklin County Jail et al
as 1:2023cv02037
Plaintiff:
Michael Smith
Defendant:
Franklin County Jail and Warden Christopher Schell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01977
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Smith v. F&M Bank et al
as 1:2023cv01951
Plaintiff:
Michael Smith
Defendant:
F&M Bank, Joy Heinbaugh, Todd A. Rock and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00456
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Brown v. Monroy et al
as 1:2022cv01401
Plaintiff:
Evan Brown
Defendant:
Adrienne Monroy, Michael Smith, Arthur Etnoyer, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Corporation of Michael Smith v. Franklin County Court of Common Pleas et al
as 1:2021cv01497
Plaintiff:
Corporation of Michael Smith
Defendant:
Franklin County Court of Common Pleas, FCADC, CADC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Vega v. Bolan, Esquire et al
as 1:2020cv00710
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Commonwealth, Michael Smith and Kayla Bolan, Esquire
Plaintiff:
Walter Vega
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Long et al
as 1:2019cv01477
Defendant:
Amber M. Long, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and Bradley D. Long
Plaintiff:
Michael Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Smith et al v. Target Corporation et al
as 1:2017cv02055
Plaintiff:
Katherine L. Smith and Michael Smith
Defendant:
Target Corporation , Target Store #2567 and Kellermeyer Bergensons Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
