Cases 1 - 10 of 17
New Mexico Forward Party et al v. Toulouse Oliver et al
as 1:2026cv02286
Plaintiff:
New Mexico Forward Party, Bob Perls, Michael Vigil and others
Defendant:
Maggie Toulouse Oliver and Barbara DeLaney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Burton et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2025cv12779
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co. and others
Plaintiff:
PAMELA BURTON, Thomas Aragon, DARIN BELAIR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Burton et al v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2025cv02760
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC, INC., Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co. and others
Plaintiff:
PAMELA BURTON, THOMAS ARAGON, DARIN BELAIR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
VIGIL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv68111
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL VIGIL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VIGIL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv82196
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL VIGIL
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vigil v. Allstate Insurance Company
as 1:2019cv02766
Plaintiff:
Michael Vigil
Defendant:
Allstate Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-15310
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01738
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
United States v. Vigil
as 11-1286
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MATTHEW MICHAEL VIGIL, AKA Gregory G. Vigil, AKA Gregory Gene Vigil, AKA Robert Max Vigil
Hynoski v. Harmston, et al
as 10-2181
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARY PATRICIA HYNOSKI
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN HARMSTON, LEA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, JAMES HALL, Judge and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
