Cases 1 - 10 of 20
USA v. Vearl Pennington, et al
as 23-5337
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
VEARL PENNINGTON
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL WILLIAMSON
Michael Williamson v. Rachael Wheeler, et al
as 22-4017
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL WILLIAMSON
Defendant / Appellee:
RACHAEL WHEELER and ANNETTE CHAMBERS-SMITH
Williamson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2022cv00063
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael Williamson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
USA v. Pennington et al
as 5:2021cv00198
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Vearl Pennington and Michael Williamson
Cross Defendant:
Hossein Hashemzadeh and FCC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Michael Williamson v. Kenneth Black
as 21-3512
Respondent / Appellee:
KENNETH BLACK, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL WILLIAMSON
Williamson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2021cv00227
Plaintiff:
Michael Williamson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
American National Property and Casualty Company v. Williamson et al
as 2:2020cv00539
Plaintiff:
American National Property and Casualty Company
Defendant:
First Hotel Management, LLC, Michael Williamson, II. and Halle's 5 Restaurants, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Michael Williamson v. Harold May
as 20-3084
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD MAY, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL WILLIAMSON
Williamson v. Marquis
as 1:2018cv00472
Petitioner:
Michael Williamson
Respondent:
Dave Marquis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael Williamson, et al v. Recovery Limited Partnership, et al
as 17-3464
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WILLIAMSON, et al.
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DISPATCH PRINTING COMPANY
Defendant:
RECOVERY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, et al
Movant - Appellant:
RICHARD THOMAS ROBOL, I
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
